Ex-CEO's (Like Jack Welch) Who Consultant to Former Employers are Independent Contractors, Not Employees -- Changed Worker Status Means They Lose Rights to Benefits and Perks They Enjoyed as Employees
Contracts
like Mr. Welchs agreement with GE allow ex-CEOs to receive the benefits of
consulting as independent contractors, without the costs of paying for their
own insurance and other benefits, not to mention the costs of doing business such as
office rent, administrative support and other costs faced every day by independent
contractors in the real working world.
In
his letter, Mr. Welch says he does not believe it is improper and there is
nothing invalid about his employment agreement with GE. He only asked GE to
change the agreement because of the perception of wrongdoing and bad public
relations that he believed was harming the company.
The IRS would
disagree with Mr. Welch. His consulting agreement violates IRS requirements governing
independent contractors. Welchs comments provide a perfect illustration of the need
to understand the distinctions between employee and independent contractor. These
revelations come at the same time the IRS has announced its highest priority for audits
are wealthy individuals.
Independent contractors are self-employed, and are required to pay their own self-employment taxes to the IRS. While the media focuses on investigations by the SEC and various Congressional Committees, we hear little of how these CEO's and their companies will account to Uncle Sam when IRS auditors find their contracts violate IRS requirements governing independent contractors and the important distinctions between employees and independent contractors in today's workforce.
(See more details on this issue in the September issue of IC Law Update Newsletter).